[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Schema Maintenance in SQL Server (Comparing "Pro2SQL" vs. "SQL DataServer" products)

[dbeavon]

@gus Yes, I am totally on the same page. What about the schema holder? This is a factor on *both* of the products and involves similar management effort, right? I am curious to understand whether PRO2SQL can be considered as (or sold as) as more "simple" solution than using DataServer (from a standpoint of the software development effort). In my mind there are lots of arguments why the PRO2 product would involve even *more* effort and not less. The most obvious argument is based on the fact that maintaining schema in 2 databases is more work than than maintaining 1.

Continue reading...