[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Any proactive schema lock for exclusive access to perform database changes (SQL92 DDL)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dmitri Levin

Guest
Yes, port number change does no affect shared-memory connections. To avoid shared-memory connections I rename the human users startup procedure, the on in their .profile to temp name before shutdown and then rename back after they are allowed to login. As to the batch jobs they check for the existence of STOP file before connection. So I temporary put a STOP file.

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

D
  • Locked
[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: Any proactive schema lock for exclusive access to perform database changes (SQL92 DDL)?
Replies
0
Views
553
dbeavon
D
D
  • Locked
[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Any proactive schema lock for exclusive access to perform database changes (SQL92 DDL)?
Replies
0
Views
424
dbeavon
D
D
  • Locked
[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Any proactive schema lock for exclusive access to perform database changes (SQL92 DDL)?
Replies
0
Views
575
dbeavon
D
C
  • Locked
[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Any proactive schema lock for exclusive access to perform database changes (SQL92 DDL)?
Replies
0
Views
346
ChUIMonster
C
D
  • Locked
[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Any proactive schema lock for exclusive access to perform database changes (SQL92 DDL)?
Replies
0
Views
456
dbeavon
D
Top