Not change since 2003???? Apparently, you haven't been paying attention. Yikes, that was 10.0A. GUI for .NET and OOABL no change? Not to mention lots of other bits.
Yeah, I was sorry personally to see the X windows go ... but realistically, what percentage of the desktop space is non-Windows? And with OpenClient, one has Java, .NET, browser RIA, and numerous other client choices ... i.e., pretty much anything that anyone else has.
Webspeed and WebClient and OpenClient aren't tools for web applications? You want that PSC should redundantly provide HTML editors or something?
Smartphones are not unknown. There were at least two papers on the topic at PUG Challenge Americas. Check it out. Again, why would PSC get into the business of actually developing the tool for the client. It exists already. You want maybe an AVM to run on a smartphone?
Have you missed all the Win 64 products. Been out for a while now. Only the client is still 32.
Industrial robots???? That isn't even slightly the market that PSC is in. You might as well criticize them for not being good at games.
There is no needs for buisness process, people known how the business works.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but it sure sounds like it is covered by Savvion. Notice how Savvion will use an OpenEdge database now? And the interaction will be built into the language in 11.0?
Well, yes, not every site is a candidate for multi-tenancy, either because they don't need it or because of security concerns. As it happens, I believe those security concerns are well addressed by the 11.0 implementation in ways they are not by the workaround solutions that companies have used up to now. But, a feature doesn't need to be universally needed to be important or a sign of an advanced tool. Have you actually looked at the 11.0 implementation? It is really quite slick.