[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Garbage collection for the sake of static temp-tables (in long-running _progres)

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dbeavon

Guest
I did find the KB about circular references. Apparently the OOABL GC isn't able to clean them, even in the case of regular OOABL object instances. See knowledgebase.progress.com/.../What-are-the-limitations-of-the-AVM-garbage-collector I'm wondering if I should open a new support case so that the KB article can be expanded? It doesn't say anything about the potential for this issue to happen in conjunction with static data. Ie, perhaps the related enhancements that are mentioned will not help us where static data is concerned (Enhancements PSC00231977, PSC00327793)

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top