[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Garbage collection for the sake of static temp-tables (in long-running _progres)

Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Fernando Souza

Guest
Are you running the code exactly how it's shown above, that is, you don't have anything else in the "do work here" part? What version are you running? If you are always passing the same temp-table from the one .p that has the loop to the class, there is only one instance of the temp-table so it couldn't be leaking, we won't create one inside the class, but instead bind it to the one in the caller procedure, so something else seems to be going on here. It could had been some sort of bug, depending on what release you are running with. I just tried it with 11.7.6 and I see everything seems to be working properly. You can start your session with -clientlog and use -logentrytypes temp-tables:4,dynobjects.class:4 and see if the objects are getting garbage collected. They should be.

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top