Recent content by onire

  1. O

    URGENT!!! -n parameter question

    hello.. i just got the same problem, running on Progress 9.1D.. can i do the same way? and where i have to find the -n parameter? many thanks...
  2. O

    Error 778: Webspeed 2.1 on NT 4.0

    i've found 778 error also with progress ver 9.1D. if there is a solution for this issue please share the information... thank you in advance.
  3. O

    Error <read/writing> socket, ret=<n>, errno=<n>. (778)

    Dear All, i'm using progress 9.1D, and if the application idle for a view minutes error message no 778 will pop out. There is no problem for the connection (f.e Cable,switch), if we do ping to the hostname we got good reply. Please help if someone know the solution for this problem. Thank you...
  4. O

    Increase -n when using _mprosrv

    got it sir.. thanks a lot... Regards, Onire
  5. O

    Increase -n when using _mprosrv

    thanks a lot... now, if there are limitation until 20 users (using multi-user session), is there any way that i can increase the -n parameter?
  6. O

    Increase -n when using _mprosrv

    that's right sir.. i'm using it for testing in MS Windows. currently i'm using Progress 9.1D (based on my other post about Progress and Linux). actually i'm in the middle of confusing. i installed red hat but is not compatible with progress 9.1D so i tried to use windows with _mprosrv act like...
  7. O

    Is Progress 9.1D supported on Redhat enpterprise 5.3 ?

    hi.. i'm facing the same problem I installed Linux red hat enterprise 5.3 and Java 1_4_2_19 when i tried to run the proinst, the same error message is showed up. my question, how can i create the symbolic link so i can make this error 'GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time...
  8. O

    Increase -n when using _mprosrv

    Hai all. i'm a new in using progress. i use _mprosrv running in MS Windows XP SP2, here it is i write down " @echo off cd \dlc\bin _mprosrv c:\,database> -N TCP -H <host> -S <port> -L 100000 " but, there are limitation max. 20 users. is it possible to increase -n <user>?:confused: thanks
Top