Looking at the original problem you described I would suspect this is a locking issue even though you say you can see no locks. For sysmptons where killing a session reactivates the progam it is hard to think of anything else. It is however likely to be not the data you are viewing in the...
The appserver agent is not properly started until the startup procedure completes with no error. If your repeat loop is in the startup procedure presumably the startup procedure does not complete so your appserver agent hasn't actually started. As it hasn't started this may explain why you can't...
on "\\" anywhere do:
return no-apply.
end.
will result in nothing happening if the user presses \
You can change anywhere to something more specific if you want.
You could try passing in an empty string password which is the 5th parameter to the open method.
Instead of checking error status try checking if the workbook handle is a valid handle which it won't be if the workbook hasn't opened
Although I have hardly used smart objects I seem to recall that version 8 smart objects are significanlty different from version 9 and a conversion utility is provided in version 9 on the pro tools menu to convert v8 smart objects to v9 smart objects.
If you have not done this it may explain...
The last-event system handle will give you the x and y cooridinates of the last mouse click.
last-event:x
last-event:y
is the syntax. It can give you a few other things as well
You are confusing the OPSYS function with the OPSYS preprocessor name. If you want to use it with &IF it should be {&OPSYS}.
If you want to use OPSYS it should
If OPSYS
If you are using an internal procedure the record will be available in all susequent calls in the first buffer you used whether or not you find the record again or define a new buffer. The original record will also be changed if you update it to whatever it was updated to in the last procedure...
The code
do while
causes the entire update to be one transaction.
If you change it to
repeat while
it will be one transaction for each iteration of the loop and you will no longer have the lock table overflow problem
Unless I am missing something I think you are mistaken as otherwise it is a remarkable conincidence that it failes for a-n and works for p-z and the string you are comparing with begins " O" that happens to be right in the middle of a-n and p-z in the alphabet. The comparison is alphabetic and...
Of course it matters where a varibale is defined, it must be before it is used and definined in such a way thats its use is within scope. Your code example doesn't work because at the line c = "hello" the variable c isn't in the compilers symbol table because the compiler hasn't encountered it...
Variables defininitions are processed at compile time with an entry being created in the compilers symbol table for the the variable when it encounters it in the code and memory being reserved for it in the compiled code. So in theory and practice your if statement makes no differance to the...
Although I do not know Java I think you are making a mistake between some sort of array reference structure with properties
mprops(0).Name where 0 is an array reference
and the offset from the start position of a block of memory
PUT-STRING(mprops,1) =
where 1 is position 1 in the...
A unique row identifier so does not make the database more efficient, it creates an overhead when it is written and more of an overhead if it is part of an index. A unique row identifier is only needed to be used as a foreign key or to order the records. The best place to assign a row identifier...
Its only better if you are certain the transaction is going to complete after the NEXT-VALUE is returned. If the order record fails any server side validation such as a missing mandatory field or non unique value in a unique index then the transaction will not compete but the sequence value will...
You could use a sequence but the problem with sequences is that they don't undo if you back out the transaction so you can get gaps in your order number.
If you want no gaps the way to do it is a table which you have used and the control record must be locked exclusively until the order record...
I do not know if this is the case as you have not posted the code in the procedures you are running but I have seen something similar to what you are describing when running Progress on Windows in the past. If you are storing your r-code in the current windows working directory for your prowin32...
RE:
I am suffering through this realization right now as I attempt to improve processing by joining multiple matrices together for the entire population or records. Though my joining is taking place with SQL-based data downloaded from Progress, the task is made impossible by the data...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.